Legal Digest -Free Speech Is Starting to Dominate the US Supreme Court's Agenda
Law News
Today's Legal News Bookmark This Website
Free Speech Is Starting to Dominate the US Supreme Court's Agenda
Legal News Digest | 2017/11/15 11:23
To get the Supreme Court's attention these days, try saying your speech rights are being violated.

Whether the underlying topic is abortion, elections, labor unions or wedding cakes, the First Amendment is starting to dominate the Supreme Court's agenda.

The court on Monday granted three new speech cases, including a challenge to a California law that requires licensed pregnancy-counseling clinics to tell patients they might be eligible for free or discounted abortions. The nine-month term now features six cases, out of 44 total, that turn on the reach of the Constitution's free speech guarantee.

Several will be among the term's most closely watched. They include a high-profile fight over a Colorado baker who refuses to make cakes for same-sex weddings and a challenge to the requirement in some states that public-sector workers pay for the cost of union representation. Both of those cases offer the prospect of ideological divides that could put the court's five Republican appointees in the majority, backing free speech rights.

Free speech also plays a central role in what could be a watershed case involving partisan voting districts. The court's liberals could join with Justice Anthony Kennedy to allow legal challenges to partisan gerrymanders for the first time. During arguments in October, Kennedy suggested those challenges would be based on the First Amendment's protections for speech and free association.

The free speech clause has had a special resonance with the court's conservative wing under Chief Justice John Roberts. The court invoked the First Amendment in the landmark 2010 Citizens United decision, which said corporations could spend unlimited sums on political causes. Writing for the five-justice majority, Kennedy equated federal spending restrictions with using "censorship to control thought."

The court has also backed speech rights with more lopsided majorities in cases involving violent video games, depictions of animal cruelty, abortion-clinic buffer zones and anti-homosexual protesters.



[PREV] [1] ..[928][929][930][931][932][933][934][935][936].. [2648] [NEXT]
All
Legal News Digest
Law Firm News
Legal Career News
Headline Legal News
Lawyer Blog Updates
Legal Business
Law News
Court Press News
Legal Interview
Legal World News
Press Release
Legal Opinions
Law Firm Marketing
Legal & Political
Law School News
What’s next for birthright citizens..
Court to hear appeal from Chevron in..
Judge asks if troops in Los Angeles ..
Court blocks Louisiana law requiring..
Judge blocks plan to allow immigrati..
Getty Images and Stability AI clash ..
Supreme Court makes it easier to cla..
Trump formally asks Congress to claw..
World financial markets welcome cour..
Cuban exiles were shielded from depo..
Justice Dept. moves to cancel police..
Arizona prosecutors ordered to send ..
Supreme Court could block Trump’s b..
Trump Seeks Supreme Court Approval t..
Jury begins deliberating in UK trial..
Judge bars deportations of Venezuela..
Judge to weigh Louisiana AG’s chall..
Judge blocks parts of Trump’s overh..
Judge bars Trump from denying federa..
Trump says he’s in ‘no rush’ to e..


   Lawyer & Law Firm Links
Oregon DUI Law Attorney
Eugene DUI Lawyer. Criminal Defense Law
www.mjmlawoffice.com
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Francisco Copyright Lawyer
www.onulawfirm.com
New York Adoption Lawyers
New York Foster Care Lawyers
Adoption Pre-Certification
www.lawrsm.com
 
 
© Legal News Digest. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Legal News Media as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Blog postings and hosted comments are available for general educational purposes only and should not be used to assess a specific legal situation. | Criminal Defense Attorney Web Design by Law Promo