|
|
|
Wal-Mart Fired Man For Washing In Bathroom, Class Action Claims
Headline Legal News |
2009/08/28 10:27
|
Courthouse News reports that Deloitte Consulting fired a man after co-defendant Wal-Mart Stores complained he washed in a bathroom as part of his daily Muslim prayer ritual, Mohammed Memon claims in Houston Federal Court.
The EEOC sued GKN Driveline North America for firing a Santerian who says he can't submit a saliva test for any reason other than a religious one, in Greensboro, N.C., Federal Court.
Class-action complaints alleging Labor Code violations have been filed against a number of defendants, including National Envelope Corp., and Pacwest Security Services, in Los Angeles Superior Court as well as ATamp;T Services, and Poulsen Construction, in San Francisco Federal Court. |
|
|
|
|
|
8th Circuit Backs School District Consolidation
Headline Legal News |
2009/08/27 09:09
|
According to Courthouse News, the 8th Circuit dismissed a challenge to an Arkansas law requiring small school districts to consolidate or be annexed by another district. Judge Gruender said the law makes school districts more cost-effective and efficient.
A group of taxpayers and parents banded together in 2004 to challenge the state Board of Education's decision to consolidate Lake View School District with the Barton-Lexa School District.
The consolidation was mandated by Act 60, which requires school districts with fewer than 350 students to be consolidated or annexed by another district.
Calling themselves the Friends of Lake View, the opponents of consolidation sued the state, its governor, the commissioner of the state's Department of Education and the Arkansas Board of Education. |
|
|
|
|
|
FTC Reins In 'Debt Relief'
Headline Legal News |
2009/08/26 15:49
|
According to Courthouse News, the Federal Trade Commission plans to combat telemarketers who advertise debt relief services that make deceptive representations to consumers. The agency's new regulation under the Telemarketing Sales Rule would prohibit misrepresentation and requires certain disclosures for consumer protection.
Such services often advertise they can reduce consumers' interest payments by specific percentages or minimum amounts, in exchange for a fee of hundreds of dollars, and falsely purport to be affiliated, or have close relationships, with consumers' creditors.
The Telemarketing Sales Rule requires that telemarketers soliciting sales of services promptly disclose the identity of the seller; the fact that the purpose of the call is to sell goods or services; and the nature of the goods or services being offered. The FTC would require the disclosure of the total cost of the debt reduction service being offered and the cost of repaying the consumer's debt. |
|
|
|
|
|
Protection Denied To Ashy-Storm Petrel
Headline Legal News |
2009/08/25 09:22
|
Courthouse News reports that the US Fish and Wildlife Service has completed a 12 month review of a petition from Center for Biological Diversity to list the Ashy-storm petrel as endangered, finding that such a listing is not warranted at this time.
In denying the Center's petition, Fish and Wildlife found that there was insufficient scientific evidence that ocean acidification has had a negative impact on the krill on which the petrel feeds. The agency also determined that previous actions to prevent light pollution at petrel nesting sites, such as a limit on allowable wattage, and prohibitions on night fishing near large nesting sites, are sufficient countermeasures to protect the nocturnal hunting of the petrel. |
|
|
|
|
|
California's Nazi Art Law Unconstitutional
Headline Legal News |
2009/08/24 13:48
|
According to Courthouse News, a state law that allows Californians to recover art stolen by Nazis is unconstitutional because it infringes on the federal government's foreign affairs powers, the 9th Circuit ruled in a case involving a16th century piece by Lucas Cranach in the Norton Museum of Art in Pasadena.
The circuit found that the scope of the 2002 statute is too broad and goes beyond providing redress to California's victims of Nazi looting.
According to circuit Judge David R.Thompson, the law's language suggests that California's real purpose was to create a friendly forum for litigating Holocaust restitution claims, open to anyone in the world to sue a museum or gallery located within or without the state. |
|
|
|
|