|
|
|
Alabama immigration fight recalls civil rights era
Legal News Digest |
2011/10/31 08:40
|
The epicenter of the fight over the patchwork of immigration laws in the United States is not Arizona, which shares a border with Mexico and became a common site for boycotts. Nor was it any of the four states that were next to pass their own crackdowns.
No, the case that's likely to be the first sorted out by the U.S. Supreme Court comes from the Deep South state of Alabama, where the nation's strictest immigration law has resurrected ugly images from the state's days as the nation's battleground for civil rights a half-century ago.
And Alabama's jump to the forefront says as much about the country's evolving demographics as it does the nation's collective memory of the state's sometimes violent path to desegregation.
With the failure of Congress in recent years to pass comprehensive federal immigration legislation, Arizona, Georgia, Utah, South Carolina and Indiana have passed their own. But supporters and opponents alike agree none contained provisions as strict as those passed in Alabama, among them one that required schools to check students' immigration status. That provision, which has been temporarily blocked, would allow the Supreme Court to reconsider a decision that said a kindergarten to high school education must be provided to illegal immigrants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
High court avoids dispute over highway crosses
Legal News Digest |
2011/10/31 08:40
|
The Supreme Court won't hear an appeal of a ruling that 12-foot-high crosses along Utah highways in honor of dead state troopers violate the Constitution.
The justices voted 8-1 Monday to reject an appeal from Utah and a state troopers' group that wanted the court to throw out the ruling and take a more permissive view of religious symbols on public land.
Since 1998, the private Utah Highway Patrol Association has paid for and erected more than a dozen memorial crosses, most of them on state land. Texas-based American Atheists Inc. and three of its Utah members sued the state in 2005.
The federal appeals court in Denver said the crosses were an unconstitutional endorsement of Christianity by the Utah state government.
Justice Clarence Thomas issued a 19-page opinion dissenting from Monday's order. Thomas said the case offered the court the opportunity to clear up confusion over its approach to disputes over the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, the prohibition against governmental endorsement of religion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
State budget cuts clog criminal justice system
Legal World News |
2011/10/27 09:48
|
Prosecutors are forced to ignore misdemeanor violations to pursue more serious crimes. Judges are delaying trials to cope with layoffs and strained staffing levels. And in some cases, those charged with violent crimes, even murder, are set free because caseloads are too heavy to ensure they receive a speedy trial.
Deep budget cuts to courts, public defenders, district attorney's and attorney general offices are testing the criminal justice system across the country. In the most extreme cases, public defenders are questioning whether their clients are getting a fair shake.
Exact figures on the extent of the cuts are hard to come by, but an American Bar Association report in August found that most states cut court funding 10 percent to 15 percent within the past three years. At least 26 states delayed filling open judgeships, while courts in 14 states were forced to lay off staff, said the report.
The National District Attorneys Association estimates that hundreds of millions of dollars in criminal justice funding and scores of positions have been cut amid the economic downturn, hampering the ability of authorities to investigate and prosecute cases. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PETA lawsuit seeks to expand animal rights
Law News |
2011/10/27 09:48
|
A federal court is being asked to grant constitutional rights to five killer whales who perform at marine parks — an unprecedented and perhaps quixotic legal action that is nonetheless likely to stoke an ongoing, intense debate at America's law schools over expansion of animal rights.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals is accusing the SeaWorld parks of keeping five star-performer whales in conditions that violate the 13th Amendment ban on slavery. SeaWorld depicted the suit as baseless.
The chances of the suit succeeding are slim, according to legal experts not involved in the case; any judge who hews to the original intent of the authors of the amendment is unlikely to find that they wanted to protect animals. But PETA relishes engaging in the court of public opinion, as evidenced by its provocative anti-fur and pro-vegan campaigns.
The suit, which PETA says it will file Wednesday in U.S. District Court in San Diego, hinges on the fact that the 13th Amendment, while prohibiting slavery and involuntary servitude, does not specify that only humans can be victims. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Koss Settles SEC Action and Shareholder Class Action
Press Release |
2011/10/26 09:48
|
Koss Corporation, the U.S. based high-fidelity stereo headphone company, and its Chief Executive Officer, Michael J. Koss, agreed to a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission without admitting or denying the Commission's charges in an action that stems from the previously reported embezzlement by the Company's former Vice President of Finance, Sujata Sachdeva. Ms. Sachdeva is currently serving an eleven year prison sentence for her crimes. The Company also announced that a settlement in principle has been reached subject to Court approval involving the claims that were brought against the Company and Michael Koss in a pending shareholder class action.
The restated financial statements that we filed with the Commission back in June 2010 describe in detail the theft that occurred within our Company and the ways that the embezzlement was concealed from members of the Board and, in particular, from Michael Koss, said David D. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Smith observed that, Although as a smaller reporting Company, Koss was not required to have its internal controls attested to by the Company's auditors, it was clear that the auditors reviewed the Company's internal controls each year as part of planning their substantive testing, and the Company's financial statements were audited each year. Those audits failed to detect the embezzlement and underlying accounting fraud that was committed against the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal News RSS Feed
