Legal Digest -Supreme Court agrees to hear Maryland cross memorial case
Law News
Today's Legal News Bookmark This Website
Supreme Court agrees to hear Maryland cross memorial case
Lawyer Blog Updates | 2018/11/04 22:34
The Supreme Court agreed Friday to hear a case about whether a nearly 100-year-old, cross-shaped war memorial located on a Maryland highway median violates the Constitution's required separation of church and state, a case that could impact hundreds of similar monuments nationwide.

A federal appeals court in Virginia had previously ruled against the approximately four-story-tall cross. The judges said that it "has the primary effect of endorsing religion and excessively entangles the government in religion."

But the Maryland officials who maintain the memorial told the Supreme Court that the monument's context and history show it is intended to convey a secular message of remembrance, not a religious message. They said the appeals court's decision would "compel the removal or dismemberment of a cherished war memorial that has served as a site of solemn commemoration and civic unity for nearly a century." In urging the high court to take the case, officials argued that the lower court's decision puts at risk hundreds of other monuments nationwide.

The approximately 40-foot-tall cross at the center of the case is located in Bladensburg, Maryland, about 5 miles from the Supreme Court. Sometimes called the "Peace Cross," it was completed in 1925, and it honors 49 men from the surrounding county who died in World War I. A plaque on the cross' base lists the names of those soldiers, and both faces of the cross have a circle with the symbol of the American Legion, the veterans organization that helped raise money to build it.

Today, responsibility for the cross falls to a Maryland parks commission that took over ownership and maintenance of it in 1961 because of traffic safety concerns. The massive concrete structure could be dangerous to motorists if it were to fall or crumble.


[PREV] [1] ..[635][636][637][638][639][640][641][642][643].. [2587] [NEXT]
All
Legal News Digest
Law Firm News
Legal Career News
Headline Legal News
Lawyer Blog Updates
Legal Business
Law News
Court Press News
Legal Interview
Legal World News
Press Release
Legal Opinions
Law Firm Marketing
Legal & Political
Law School News
A man who threatened to kill Democra..
VA asks US Supreme Court to reinstat..
Kenya’s deputy president pleads not..
Texas Supreme Court halts execution ..
Nebraska high court to decide if res..
Supreme Court grapples with governor..
US court to review civil rights laws..
Supreme Court leaves in place two Bi..
New rules regarding election certifi..
North Carolina appeals court blocks ..
Former Singaporean minister pleads g..
Mexican cartel leader’s son convict..
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs jailed by judge..
Algerian court certifies Tebboune’s..
‘The Mentalist’ star Simon Baker a..
Alaska high court lets man serving a..
Google faces new antitrust trial aft..
Trial begins over Texas ‘Trump Trai..
Trial begins over Texas ‘Trump Trai..
Venezuela’s Supreme Court certifies..


   Lawyer & Law Firm Links
Oregon DUI Law Attorney
Eugene DUI Lawyer. Criminal Defense Law
www.mjmlawoffice.com
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Francisco Copyright Lawyer
www.onulawfirm.com
New York Adoption Lawyers
New York Foster Care Lawyers
Adoption Pre-Certification
www.lawrsm.com
 
 
© Legal News Digest. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Legal News Media as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Blog postings and hosted comments are available for general educational purposes only and should not be used to assess a specific legal situation. | Criminal Defense Attorney Web Design by Law Promo